“There isn't any ocular evidence to show that Muhammad Abbas was murdered by any of your present petitioners. Mere fact that Noor Muhammad and Muhammad Din saw firstly the deceased and after a long way they saw the petitioners going towards the same direction, didn't mean that the petitioners were chasing the deceased or were accompanying him. These kinds of evidence cannot be treated as evidence of last witnessed.

The mentioned case laws offer insights into how the courts interpret and apply Section 302, emphasizing the importance of a fair and just legal system. It can be crucial for society to understand the gravity of this offense plus the need for stringent punishment to deter potential offenders and ensure justice for the victims and their households.

These platforms empower individuals to understand their legal rights and obligations, advertising a more informed and just society.

Deterrence: The worry of severe penalties, including capital punishment, is meant to deter possible criminals from committing murder. This deterrent effect is important in reducing the occurrence of intentional killings.

criminal revision application is dismissed. reduced for the period of his detention in jail he has already undergone(Criminal Revision )

Power to levy tax and to legislate on immovable property like tax on once-a-year rental value of immovable property after 18th Amendment(CONSTITUTION OF PAKISTAN, 1973)

148 . Const. P. 8180/2019 (D.B.) Saif Shujaat and Ors V/S Govt. of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Supplied the legal analysis on the topic issue, we're from the view that the claim of your petitioners for retroactive regularization from their First contract appointment and promotion thereon, from that angle is just not legally audio, Aside from promotion and seniority, not absolute rights, They can be topic to rules and regulations In the event the recruitment rules of the subject post allow the case on the petitioners for promotion might be considered, however, we have been apparent within our point of view that contractual service cannot be regarded as for seniority and promotion because the seniority here is reckoned from the date of normal appointment and promotion depends upon seniority cum Exercise, topic to availability of vacancy subject into the approval in the competent authority. Read more

Some pluralist systems, for instance Scots law in Scotland and types of civil legislation jurisdictions in Quebec and Louisiana, don't exactly in good shape into the dual common-civil legislation system classifications. These types of systems may perhaps have been greatly influenced via the Anglo-American common law tradition; however, their substantive legislation is firmly rooted during the civil legislation tradition.

The regulation as proven in previous court rulings; like common regulation, which springs from judicial decisions and tradition.

Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. 8180/2019 (D.B.) Saif Shujaat and Ors V/S Govt. of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-223999 Tag:Given the legal analysis on the subject issue, we have been with the view that the claim in the petitioners for retroactive regularization from their Original contract appointment and promotion thereon, from that angle just isn't legally audio, Moreover promotion and seniority, not absolute rights, They're matter to rules and regulations In case the recruitment rules of the topic post allow the case of your petitioners for promotion might be thought of, however, we are distinct within our point of view that contractual service cannot be regarded for seniority and promotion as the seniority is reckoned from the date of normal appointment and promotion depends upon seniority cum fitness, subject to availability of vacancy topic towards the approval in the competent authority.

In case the employee fails to provide a grievance notice, the NIRC may possibly dismiss the grievance petition. This is because the employer has not experienced an opportunity to reply to the grievance and attempt to resolve it. In some cases, the NIRC may well allow the employee to amend the grievance petilion to incorporate the grievance notice. However, this is normally only done In case the employee can show that that they had a good reason for not serving the grievance notice. While in the present case, the parties were allowed to lead evidence along with the petitioner company responded towards the allegations therefore they were nicely mindful of the allegations and led the evidence therefore this point is ofno use for being looked into in constitutional jurisdiction at this stage. Read more

, which is Latin for “stand by decided matters.” This means that a court will be bound to rule in accordance with a previously made ruling to the same type of case.

Search for websites affiliated with dependable legal institutions or organizations. Verify the information against other sources when probable.

To acquire notification from the Supreme Court of Virginia as well as Court of Appeals of Virginia when opinions, orders, rule changes, dockets and other information has become readily available, please enter your contact information underneath.